RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

Request for standard conform save and export function

This discussion is connected to the gimp-developer-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

2 of 2 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

Request for standard conform save and export function RubbelDeCatc 05 Feb 14:54
  Request for standard conform save and export function Alexandre Prokoudine 05 Feb 15:57
RubbelDeCatc
2013-02-05 14:54:55 UTC (about 12 years ago)

Request for standard conform save and export function

I decided to use this way to send an urgent request to the gimp developers.

I am using Gimp professionally since many years and i am very glad about the progress Gimp made the last years.

With 2.8 there was a change in the way Gimp saves images.

I every program of the world the save function (Strg-s) is used to save Documents. 90% of my load and save transactions with gimp are done in other formats then XCF.

The export-function is normally only for formats the program can not re-import again.

To point that out. It is not my intend to criticize. But Gimp already has an acceptance problem because of its unusual usability paradigms.

I doubt that the unnecessary and ignorant decision to force users to use export instead of save will be counterproductive for the future of Gimp.

regards
    Dirk
aka ------ <<
RubbelDeKatz

Btw.: I know that there is a workaround. But have you ever recognized 
the thousands of questions and comments from beginners concerning the 
save function?
http://inphotos.org/2012/07/04/save-instead-of-export-in-gimp-2-8/
Alexandre Prokoudine
2013-02-05 15:57:21 UTC (about 12 years ago)

Request for standard conform save and export function

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:54 PM, RubbelDeCatc wrote:

I decided to use this way to send an urgent request to the gimp developers.

I am using Gimp professionally since many years and i am very glad about the progress Gimp made the last years.

With 2.8 there was a change in the way Gimp saves images.

I every program of the world the save function (Strg-s) is used to save Documents. 90% of my load and save transactions with gimp are done in other formats then XCF.

The export-function is normally only for formats the program can not re-import again.

To point that out. It is not my intend to criticize. But Gimp already has an acceptance problem because of its unusual usability paradigms.

I doubt that the unnecessary and ignorant decision to force users to use export instead of save will be counterproductive for the future of Gimp.

-- regards
Dirk
aka ------ <<
RubbelDeKatz

Btw.: I know that there is a workaround. But have you ever recognized the thousands of questions and comments from beginners concerning the save function?

We've been through half a dozen of long threads about this. Thank you for attempting to start yet another one while not using any rude words whatsoever :)

Yes, we do recognize that it's a problem for some users. No, it's less of a problem for the kind of users we target, and we know users who successfully adapted to the new workflow an even loved it.

No, the export function is _not_ normally only for formats the program cannot re-import again, as proven by dozens of DAW, NLE and other kinds of applications.

No, we are not considering to revert the change, but we are thinking of ways to fix the "Confirm closing unsaved images" problem.

Yes, we are sorry that it's a problem for you. Hopefully you will find the existing workarounds sufficient.

Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org