On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 11:40 +0100, ginodonig@gmail.com wrote:

Hi.

After glancing over the various commands listed inside the Script-Fu Procedure Browser, I noticed that it ain't possible to invoke Jitter and Brush Dynamics by using the Script-Fu language.

It would be nice if these two useful features were implemented within Script-Fu in some way.

By chance, the addition of these functionalities into Script-Fu (as new procedures or maybe as arguments of existing procedures) is planned for upcoming versions of GIMP?

yes.

ciao,
--mitch

Oops- missed the reply-all...

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Rob Antonishen wrote: As far as I know, there is no blueprint at this time. I had previously asked when the 2.4 current brush options (mainly brush scaling) would be either respected from scripts or selectable as parameters.

There is a bugtrack item on this. I would suspect a whole new PDB call will have to be created with new parameters, and the old calls eventually depreciated. It might be worth making the new one take all parameters as a single argument consisting of parameter enums and values so it can be extended later without changing the PDB call again as more brush options become available.

-Rob A>

Hi.

After glancing over the various commands listed inside the Script-Fu Procedure Browser, I noticed that it ain't possible to invoke Jitter and Brush Dynamics by using the Script-Fu language.

It would be nice if these two useful features were implemented within Script-Fu in some way.

By chance, the addition of these functionalities into Script-Fu (as new procedures or maybe as arguments of existing procedures) is planned for upcoming versions of GIMP?

yes.

ciao,
--mitch

Out of curiosity, generally speaking, how this integration will be eventually performed? Maybe, Brush Dynamics and Jitter will become new arguments of the Script-Fu procedures concerning Brush Tools (like gimp-paintbrush, gimp-dodgeburn, gimp-edit-stroke, etc...) ?

Thanks in advance.

Sorry if my question is out of context: has this problem anything to do with the fact that the Gfig or Spyrogimp filters, for example, are no longer usable with version 2.7, since there is no way to change the size of the brush?

On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 08:59 +0100, Olivier wrote:

Sorry if my question is out of context: has this problem anything to do with the fact that the Gfig or Spyrogimp filters, for example, are no longer usable with version 2.7, since there is no way to change the size of the brush?

That is certainly a different issue. But if you can still reproduce it with a recent git checkout, then you should make sure that it is reported in our bug-tracker.

Sven

On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 14:16 +0100, ginodonig@gmail.com wrote:

Hi.

2009/10/31 Michael Natterer
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 11:40 +0100, ginodonig@gmail.com wrote: > Hi.
>
> After glancing over the various commands listed inside the Script-Fu
> Procedure Browser, I noticed that it ain't possible to invoke Jitter
> and Brush Dynamics by using the Script-Fu language. >
> It would be nice if these two useful features were implemented within
> Script-Fu in some way.
>
> By chance, the addition of these functionalities into Script-Fu (as
> new procedures or maybe as arguments of existing procedures) is
> planned for upcoming versions of GIMP?

yes.

ciao,
--mitch



Out of curiosity, generally speaking, how this integration will be eventually performed? Maybe, Brush Dynamics and Jitter will become new arguments of the Script-Fu procedures concerning Brush Tools (like gimp-paintbrush, gimp-dodgeburn, gimp-edit-stroke, etc...) ?

We don't know yet, but additional parameters are not an option because that would break existing scripts. The general plan is to introduce variable argument lists with named parameters and default values, but for paint properties I guess there will simply be more setters in the gimp-context namespace that will affect the paint functions.

ciao, --mitch