RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

cmyk question part II

This discussion is connected to the gimp-user-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

1 of 1 message available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

cmyk question part II Jaime Seuma 08 Mar 19:10
Jaime Seuma
2008-03-08 19:10:05 UTC (almost 17 years ago)

cmyk question part II

Hi again.

I've just read a nice article (http://kde-artists.org/node/355) signed by land0. In this article, t he author explains some state of the art concerning cmyk and 16 b depth color support (the article was written in 2006).

I should have started my cmyk previous question stating that I understand the wonderful work that the guys at gimp have been doing all that time.

Maybe because the Gimp is so great and powerful, more and more people are starting to feel they can get rid of photoshop (which I don't know a lot) and switch to gimp. And perhaps, looking at how much has been achieved so far, they perceive that the cmyk and 16 bits support are minor details... Reading the forementioned article, I can see that they are not.
I don't know if my previous mail might have sound as if I was 'urging' you to implement these features in the gimp. If that is the case, sorry; but I never meant it.

It's just that I'd like a lot of people switching to great opensource os-es and apps, and I can't help but recommend it to everyone.

Anyways, I feel I have to thank you all for the wonderful job at the gimp, which I proudly use to edit and enhance my own pictures.

Salud