RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled
  1. Chat
  2. Useful links
  3. Polls

Featured content

question

This discussion is connected to the gimp-user-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

5 of 5 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.
question Elwin Estle 16 Nov 03:34
  question David Gowers 16 Nov 06:14
   question Sven Neumann 16 Nov 08:41
2.4 question rcook@pcug.org.au 16 Nov 04:03
  2.4 question David Gowers 16 Nov 06:18
Elwin Estle
2007-11-16 03:34:26 UTC (about 17 years ago)

question

I have been busy with other projects and haven't really had a chance to sit down and play with 2.4.1. It's pretty impressive. I do have one question. Why can't one scale the smudge tool? I am guessing that smudging complicates things too much, but I am still curious.

_____________________________________

rcook@pcug.org.au
2007-11-16 04:03:33 UTC (about 17 years ago)

2.4 question

With 2.2, when making a selection, then creating a new image, the new image dimensions were those of the selection.

This does not seem to be the case in 2.4, you get the default image size.

Or have I missed something

TIA

Owen

David Gowers
2007-11-16 06:14:34 UTC (about 17 years ago)

question

Hi Elwin,

On Nov 16, 2007 1:04 PM, Elwin Estle wrote:

I have been busy with other projects and haven't really had a chance to sit down and play with 2.4.1. It's pretty impressive. I do have one question. Why can't one scale the smudge tool? I am guessing that smudging complicates things too much, but I am still curious.

The short answer is: The smudge tool uses a different painting backend, and so the 'scale' setting did not take appropriate effect (since changing brush size during smudging is not a very sensible thing to be able to do, the smudge backend simply ignored scaling factors.). This has since been fixed. The first 2.5 release will include the fix (and it might be backported and included in 2.4.2 as well.). The version I'm using right now (from the SVN repository) includes this fix.

David Gowers
2007-11-16 06:18:40 UTC (about 17 years ago)

2.4 question

Hi Owen,

On Nov 16, 2007 1:33 PM, wrote:

With 2.2, when making a selection, then creating a new image, the new image dimensions were those of the selection.

This does not seem to be the case in 2.4, you get the default image size.

That is correct. If you want a new image matching the selection size, you can do the following:

1. Edit->Copy 2. Edit->Paste As->New Image

Or have I missed something

TIA

Owen

Sven Neumann
2007-11-16 08:41:56 UTC (about 17 years ago)

question

Hi,

On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 15:44 +1030, David Gowers wrote:

The short answer is: The smudge tool uses a different painting backend, and so the 'scale' setting did not take appropriate effect (since changing brush size during smudging is not a very sensible thing to be able to do, the smudge backend simply ignored scaling factors.). This has since been fixed. The first 2.5 release will include the fix (and it might be backported and included in 2.4.2 as well.).

Since this is a new feature and not strictly a bug-fix, it is not going to be backported to the 2.4 series.

Sven