RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

Pngs, jpgs, tifs, etc.,

This discussion is connected to the gimp-user-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

4 of 5 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

Pngs, jpgs, tifs, etc., carol irvin 25 Oct 02:26
  Pngs, jpgs, tifs, etc., Chris Mohler 25 Oct 03:32
   Pngs, jpgs, tifs, etc., carol irvin 25 Oct 06:03
    54FB3414D66.00000823pete992... Peter Russell 26 Oct 04:55
  Pngs, jpgs, tifs, etc., rcook@pcug.org.au 25 Oct 04:36
carol irvin
2007-10-25 02:26:37 UTC (about 17 years ago)

Pngs, jpgs, tifs, etc.,

i too have found myself using pngs a lot more than jpgs and for the same reason. the image came in as
a jpg though, i went ahead and worked with it as a jpg. however, i too would have preferred tackling
it as a png file. my absolute first choice would be a tif but it was given in the problem that a tif was out.

carol

Chris Mohler
2007-10-25 03:32:52 UTC (about 17 years ago)

Pngs, jpgs, tifs, etc.,

On 10/24/07, carol irvin wrote:

i too have found myself using pngs a lot more than jpgs and for the same reason. the image came in as
a jpg though, i went ahead and worked with it as a jpg. however, i too would have preferred tackling
it as a png file. my absolute first choice would be a tif but it was given in the problem that a tif was out.

In this case - the "problem JPEG" - re-saving as JPEG would only produce more of the same artifacts that were causing grief to the engraver.

As a designer I frequently deal with this scenario: "Hi, we need X printed on Y and it needs to be Z feet tall. All I have is this (crappy) JPEG (or fax, doc, ppt, etc)". I try this:

1. is it a corporation? is the logo on brandsoftheworld.com? 2. do they have vector artwork on their web page (hidden in a PDF, etc)? 3. is it just a font? can "what the font" figure it out? 4. can I salvage it in GIMP (or PS) or Inkscape? 5. redo it :(

Regardless of the solution, the format chosen to save my work in is up to me - just because I was _given_ a JPEG, there's no reason for me to _save_ it as JPEG later.

Sorry, this turned into a bit of a rant.... I guess all I was trying to say is that you're not locked into saving as a JPEG just because that's all the client has to offer :)

Chris

rcook@pcug.org.au
2007-10-25 04:36:27 UTC (about 17 years ago)

Pngs, jpgs, tifs, etc.,

i too have found myself using pngs a lot more than jpgs and for the same reason. the image came in as
a jpg though, i went ahead and worked with it as a jpg. however, i too would have preferred tackling
it as a png file. my absolute first choice would be a tif but it was given
in the problem that a tif was out.

I think as a rule of thumb, that you should always work in the native format of your program, so if you are using the Gimp,

a. Save the image in the xcf format b. Do all your work in the xcf format c. When finished, save in appropriate format for publication

Owen

carol irvin
2007-10-25 06:03:49 UTC (about 17 years ago)

Pngs, jpgs, tifs, etc.,

this is probably going to sound like a really weird solution to a problem but it has worked for me over the years. i often wander off the beaten path though so that tendency may work for someone else too. if i have an image that isn't working in the computer, i make the best possible print i can of it. then i may go into that print with other (live) media and punch it up that way. then i scan the print into the computer and make a new image from the scan in a file format i like and with a resolution that is better than what i had. then i use the image program to adjust the image until it takes shape as something i want to keep. usually there is a good chunk of the original image which still remains so all has not been lost.

i am simply not used to using the native format of the GIMP program. for awhile i used to use the native format for photoshop, which was psd. then i discovered that a whole bunch of other programs i had would not show a thumbnail of a psd. yet they would all show it of a tif. (this was while i was using windows as my OS) so i started using tif and was happy with using it. there is some relief in knowing that every single program you have on your computer will be able to show the image in the tif format. this is also true of the jpg, the png and the gif.

carol

On 10/24/07, Chris Mohler wrote:

On 10/24/07, carol irvin wrote:

i too have found myself using pngs a lot more than jpgs and for the same reason. the image came in as
a jpg though, i went ahead and worked with it as a jpg. however, i too would have preferred tackling
it as a png file. my absolute first choice would be a tif but it was

given

in the problem that a tif was out.

In this case - the "problem JPEG" - re-saving as JPEG would only produce more of the same artifacts that were causing grief to the engraver.

As a designer I frequently deal with this scenario: "Hi, we need X printed on Y and it needs to be Z feet tall. All I have is this (crappy) JPEG (or fax, doc, ppt, etc)". I try this:

1. is it a corporation? is the logo on brandsoftheworld.com? 2. do they have vector artwork on their web page (hidden in a PDF, etc)? 3. is it just a font? can "what the font" figure it out? 4. can I salvage it in GIMP (or PS) or Inkscape? 5. redo it :(

Regardless of the solution, the format chosen to save my work in is up to me - just because I was _given_ a JPEG, there's no reason for me to _save_ it as JPEG later.

Sorry, this turned into a bit of a rant.... I guess all I was trying to say is that you're not locked into saving as a JPEG just because that's all the client has to offer :)

Chris _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user