RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name

This discussion is connected to the gimp-user-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

10 of 10 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name Michael Strout 25 May 17:22
  gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name scl 26 May 12:39
  gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name Michael Schumacher 26 May 12:48
   gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name Steve Kinney 26 May 19:07
    gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name Michael Schumacher 26 May 19:43
     gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name Steve Kinney 26 May 22:17
      gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name Øyvind Kolås 26 May 22:56
       gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name Steve Kinney 26 May 23:18
    gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name Jernej Simončič 26 May 20:35
     gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name Steve Kinney 26 May 22:18
Michael Strout
2013-05-25 17:22:56 UTC (over 11 years ago)

gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name

Hi all,
I just received a text message on google voice with something which was made to look like a failed image embed that led to this page http://imgsend.com/?photo=792MBQ which talked about requiring a gimp photo viewer for a .JPG.GMP file. Links lead to a gimpx.org domain which thing looks like a malicious site crafted to fool windows users into installing malware to me.

If I'm incorrect and this is somehow a valid tool please let me know to set my mind at ease. If not, does anyone know if there's something that can be done about it?

scl
2013-05-26 12:39:27 UTC (over 11 years ago)

gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name

On 25.05.13 at 7:22 PM Michael Strout wrote:

http://imgsend.com/?photo=792MBQ which talked about requiring a gimp photo viewer for a .JPG.GMP file. Links lead to a gimpx.org domain which thing

That is obviously an attempt to abuse GIMPs name for something different, if not malicious activities. GIMPs own image files don't have the GMP extension and GIMPs website is not gimpx.org.
Don't let yourself be fooled.

Kind regards,

Sven

Michael Schumacher
2013-05-26 12:48:28 UTC (over 11 years ago)

gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name

On 25.05.2013 19:22, Michael Strout wrote:

Hi all,
I just received a text message on google voice with something which was made to look like a failed image embed that led to this page http://imgsend.com/?photo=792MBQ which talked about requiring a gimp photo viewer for a .JPG.GMP file. Links lead to a gimpx.org domain which thing looks like a malicious site crafted to fool windows users into installing malware to me.

Yes, it is. See
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2012-August/msg00074.html for an analysis, with slightly different urls.

If I'm incorrect and this is somehow a valid tool please let me know to set my mind at ease.

This isn't a valid tool. Most likely a trojan.

If not, does anyone know if there's something that can be done about it?

Educating users would be the best approach. Any suggestions how to phrase a warning for www.gimp.org/downloads?

Regards,
Michael
Steve Kinney
2013-05-26 19:07:06 UTC (over 11 years ago)

gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name

On 05/26/2013 08:48 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote:

On 25.05.2013 19:22, Michael Strout wrote:

Hi all,
I just received a text message on google voice with something which
was made to look like a failed image embed that led to this page http://imgsend.com/?photo=792MBQ which talked about requiring a gimp photo
viewer for a .JPG.GMP file. Links lead to a gimpx.org domain which thing
looks like a malicious site crafted to fool windows users into installing
malware to me.

Yes, it is. See
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2012-August/msg00074.html for an analysis, with slightly different urls.

The owner of the domain name "gimpx.org" is hiding behind a pseudo-anonymous registrar. That in itself is enough to rule out installing anything offered on the site.

The hosting service where the gimpx.org website lives, secureserver.net, presents a "404 page not found" notice at http://secureserver.net/index.html, another strong indicator of "other than honest" intentions.

If I'm incorrect and this is somehow a valid tool please let me know to set my mind at ease.

This isn't a valid tool. Most likely a trojan.

Looks that way to me. Maybe somebody who has the time and interest will install it in a virtual machine and audit the results to determine what the gimpx.org installer actually is/does. But directing users to the "real goods" provides a complete solution, so why bother?

If not, does anyone know if there's something that can be done about it?

Educating users would be the best approach. Any suggestions how to phrase a warning for www.gimp.org/downloads?

The Windows installation instructions in my GIMP tutorial for beginners at http://pilobilus.net/gimp_tutorial.html conclude with:

Warning! Do not download the GIMP from unofficial websites offering "Free Downloads." Sabotaged GIMP installers rigged with trojans have been discovered in the wild.

The phrase "rigged with trojans" has a hyperlink to:

http://blog.meetthegimp.org/yay-mainstream-and-trojaned-gimp-installers/

It might be useful to put a warning like this on the front page of the GIMP site, followed by a link to the relevant Sourceforge page for the "real" Windows port. The educational impact would be substantial.

Also, the GIMP site's front page has a Google rank of 7 (out of 10 on a log scale), so a hyperlink here would add a lot of weight in search result placement of the Sourceforge page for the GIMP installer. This would help prevent search engines from being manipulated via SEO to send people to sites with trojanized GIMP installers.

At present, the link to the Windows port on the Downloads page at gimp.org is hidden behind a "show other downloads" link buried in the middle of the page. This is hard to justify, as the majority of current and potential users are on Microsoft platforms. The GIMP is a *powerful* gateway drug for Free Software, so (literally) hiding it from people who are using Microsoft junk does Linux advocacy no favors.

I would be inclined to move the link for Windoze installers to the top of the Downloads page on the GIMP website. The higher on the page this link appears, the more likely that a search engine will direct would-be first time users there, rather than to a hosting service for malware.

:o)

Steve

Michael Schumacher
2013-05-26 19:43:49 UTC (over 11 years ago)

gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name

On 26.05.2013 21:07, Steve Kinney wrote:

At present, the link to the Windows port on the Downloads page at gimp.org is hidden behind a "show other downloads" link buried in the middle of the page.

You're not using a Windows platform, are you?

Regards,
Michael
Jernej Simončič
2013-05-26 20:35:43 UTC (over 11 years ago)

gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name

On Sun, 26 May 2013 15:07:06 -0400, Steve Kinney wrote:

The owner of the domain name "gimpx.org" is hiding behind a pseudo-anonymous registrar. That in itself is enough to rule out installing anything offered on the site.

My own domains all have privacy protection enabled - and one of them is the first place where I offer the installers, often days before I upload them to SourceForge.

< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ >
Steve Kinney
2013-05-26 22:17:02 UTC (over 11 years ago)

gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name

On 05/26/2013 03:43 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:

On 26.05.2013 21:07, Steve Kinney wrote:

At present, the link to the Windows port on the Downloads page at gimp.org is hidden behind a "show other downloads" link buried in the middle of the page.

You're not using a Windows platform, are you?

Nope, left that nonsense behind ages ago. At the moment my main workstation is running Mint 14 w/Cinnamon, see:

http://pilobilus.net/linux_mint_review.html

For my take on the quality and reliability of Microsoft products, see the sections on System Security and Hardware Level Attacks here:

http://pilobilus.net/comsec-101.html

I have pretty much settled on Debian Testing as a replacement for Mint when it "expires" next year.

:o)

Steve

Steve Kinney
2013-05-26 22:18:08 UTC (over 11 years ago)

gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name

On 05/26/2013 04:35 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote:

On Sun, 26 May 2013 15:07:06 -0400, Steve Kinney wrote:

The owner of the domain name "gimpx.org" is hiding behind a pseudo-anonymous registrar. That in itself is enough to rule out installing anything offered on the site.

My own domains all have privacy protection enabled - and one of them is the first place where I offer the installers, often days before I upload them to SourceForge.

A matter of preference... but I bet the people who download code from your sites know exactly who they are dealing with!

:o)

Steve

Øyvind Kolås
2013-05-26 22:56:04 UTC (over 11 years ago)

gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:

On 05/26/2013 03:43 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:

On 26.05.2013 21:07, Steve Kinney wrote:

At present, the link to the Windows port on the Downloads page at gimp.org is hidden behind a "show other downloads" link buried in the middle of the page.

You're not using a Windows platform, are you?

Nope, left that nonsense behind ages ago. At the moment my main workstation is running Mint 14 w/Cinnamon, see:

The reason for the question was that "show other downloads" is supposed to be for other platforms than the one you are browsing with ;)

/

Steve Kinney
2013-05-26 23:18:08 UTC (over 11 years ago)

gimpx? possible malicious software using Gimp name

On 05/26/2013 06:56 PM, Øyvind Kolås wrote:

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Steve Kinney > wrote:

[ ... ]

The reason for the question was that "show other downloads" is supposed to be for other platforms than the one you are browsing with ;)

Well that makes sense - very clever, and not at all hard to justify!

:o)

Steve