RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

Select > Feather - OR - Select > Invert > Feather

This discussion is connected to the gimp-user-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

3 of 3 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

Select > Feather - OR - Select > Invert > Feather DJ 21 May 18:40
  Select > Feather - OR - Select > Invert > Feather saulgoode@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com 21 May 21:19
   Select > Feather - OR - Select > Invert > Feather saulgoode@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com 21 May 21:44
DJ
2009-05-21 18:40:18 UTC (over 15 years ago)

Select > Feather - OR - Select > Invert > Feather

Hi Gimp-users,

I've seen some tutorials that do either:

1a. Make a Selection and then Feather. - OR -
1b. Make a Selection, Invert the Selection, and then Feather.

Sometimes, in either case, there is an intervening Grow.

Does the Invert of the Selection and then the Feathering (1b) produce different results than just Feathering the original Selection (1a)?

Thank you.

saulgoode@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com
2009-05-21 21:19:00 UTC (over 15 years ago)

Select > Feather - OR - Select > Invert > Feather

Quoting DJ :

1a. Make a Selection and then Feather. - OR -
1b. Make a Selection, Invert the Selection, and then Feather.

Sometimes, in either case, there is an intervening Grow.

Does the Invert of the Selection and then the Feathering (1b) produce different results than just Feathering the original Selection (1a)?

The feathered version of the inverted selection will of course be inverted compared to the feathered version of the selection, but otherwise identical.

saulgoode@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com
2009-05-21 21:44:43 UTC (over 15 years ago)

Select > Feather - OR - Select > Invert > Feather

Quoting saulgoode@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com:

The feathered version of the inverted selection will of course be inverted compared to the feathered version of the selection, but otherwise identical.

I am going to retract that -- or at least qualify it. There is a difference if the selection mask is not "boolean", that is if it was already "feathered" to some degree before being feathered.