Alchemie Foto\grafiche
--- Lun 20/10/08, gimp-user-request@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU ha scritto:
Da: gimp-user-request@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Oggetto: Gimp-user Digest, Vol 73, Issue 41
A: gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Data: Lunedì 20 ottobre 2008, 06:12
Send Gimp-user mailing list submissions to
gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
gimp-user-request@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
You can reach the person managing the list at
gimp-user-owner@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gimp-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Changing events (Daniel Hornung)
2. Re: export and save as gif dialogs (eleonora46@gmx.net)
3. Re: Searching GIMP user manual (Sven Neumann)
4. Re: script-fu-save-anim-layers (Alec Burgess)
5. Re: export and save as gif dialogs
(saulgoode@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com)
6. Re: ftp address for 2.6.1 rpm (Rick)
7. rectangular selection (presyesc)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:35:09 +0200
From: Daniel Hornung
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Changing events
To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On Sunday 19 October 2008, Johan Vromans wrote:
Hi,
I have a couple of databases where I entered the date that people were
christened instead of date of birth, the latter being unknown.
However, The Narrative Web Report seems to use the event Baptism
instead of Christening.
Is there an easy way to change Christening to Baptism for all entries
in the database?
I tried to export GRAMPS XML, issue a search/replace on the text and
then re-import the XML. This seems to work but can I be sure no
information gets lost this way?
-- Johan
Hi,
you're probably writing to the wrong mailing list?
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : /lists/gimp-user/attachments/20081019/81c93270/attachment-0001.bin
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:46:35 +0200
From: eleonora46@gmx.net
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] export and save as gif dialogs
To: saulgoode@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com,
gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
#1. Is it possible to have the outputted filename derived from the
original image's filename? For example, if you are selecting from an
image named "somegirl.gif" then could the script assume that the
output filename should be named "somegirl-cutout.gif"?
No. Picture 2 is derived from the page number where it is,
for example the first image on page 3248 of picture 100.gif is called
32481.gif, picture2 32482.gif, etc...
page number is contained by the original picture, and has nothing to do
with it's name. Original picture is called in the example 100.gif, and the
derived pictures are called 32481.gif, 32482.gif and 32491.gif
To find the proper name is job for a human, the machine
can not effectively help there.
#2. Is it necessary to create a new image from the copied region? And
even if it is (e.g., you want to edit the pasted image), would it be
acceptable if the script performed the creation of this image. I.e.,
you make your selection and then run the script -- the new image is
opened (if necessary) and then saved as a GIF.
The script is unable to create the images. They must be created manually.
They are pictures in written text, and only a human can decide,
which parts are images and which parts are text. The selected
part then usually gets modified in size and also sometimes rotated.
All jobs, only a human can do properly.
I checked with the most up-to-date ocr programs, they do a lousy
job when they try to find out, which parts are pictures and
which are text. They err in 20-30% of the cases, which
is completely unacceptable and unusable for me.
Of course, doing precisely what you described is possible; it just
entails some steps that might better be automated.
That exactly would speed up my work by at least 20-30%.
Thanks, eleonora
