RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

crop tool's little annoyance

This discussion is connected to the gimp-developer-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

4 of 4 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

crop tool's little annoyance Alexandre Prokoudine 23 Oct 15:54
  crop tool's little annoyance Martin Nordholts 23 Oct 19:49
   crop tool's little annoyance Alexandre Prokoudine 23 Oct 20:56
    crop tool's little annoyance Martin Nordholts 23 Oct 23:21
Alexandre Prokoudine
2007-10-23 15:54:58 UTC (about 17 years ago)

crop tool's little annoyance

Hi,

It looks like there is a small regression of Crop tool's behaviour as of svn trunk: if you draw a relatively small selection (size matters only for better ) and start switching portrait/landscape mode, the selection grows until it fits width/height of the image by either side. That doesn't look like a intentionally designed feature.

Alexandre

Martin Nordholts
2007-10-23 19:49:20 UTC (about 17 years ago)

crop tool's little annoyance

Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:

Hi,

It looks like there is a small regression of Crop tool's behaviour as of svn trunk: if you draw a relatively small selection (size matters only for better ) and start switching portrait/landscape mode, the selection grows until it fits width/height of the image by either side. That doesn't look like a intentionally designed feature.

Hello

I am unable to reproduce this, for what ratio and rectangle size does this occur?

- Martin Nordholts

Alexandre Prokoudine
2007-10-23 20:56:38 UTC (about 17 years ago)

crop tool's little annoyance

On 10/23/07, Martin Nordholts wrote:

I am unable to reproduce this, for what ratio and rectangle size does this occur?

3:2, 4:3

Alexandre

Martin Nordholts
2007-10-23 23:21:12 UTC (about 17 years ago)

crop tool's little annoyance

Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:

On 10/23/07, Martin Nordholts wrote:

I am unable to reproduce this, for what ratio and rectangle size does this occur?

3:2, 4:3

Alexandre

Seems to be an integer rounding issue. I have planned to change internal rectangle coordinates to doubles for 2.5/2.6 to fix a bunch of other rounding-related errors I have noted, and this bug should be indirectly solved then as well.

- Martin Nordholts