Hi All,

I have been trying to attach a scrollbar to a text widget. But I am facing problems doing so.I've figured out that Gtk_Text has a 'vadj' and 'hadj' of type Gtk_Adjustment. And so I need to give Gtk_VScrollBar the 'vadj' to get
it to work.

This is what I am doing:

text = gtk_text_new (NULL, NULL); /* uses the newly-created adjustment for the scrollbar as well */ vscrollbar = gtk_vscrollbar_new (GTK_TEXT(text)->vadj);

The error which I see is:

invalid type argument of `->' invalid type argument of `->'

please suggest..

Thanks in advance -hari

On 1/5/06, Leon Brooks wrote:

On Wednesday 04 January 2006 23:17, Todd Relyea wrote:

Is someone responsible for keeping the gegl web site up to date? I've noticed some out of date and broken links on the main page.

If not, I'd be more than willing to lend a hand...

Seconded. Let's get this show back on the road!

Already done, more to follow :)

Alexandre

Leon Brooks wrote:

On Sunday 08 January 2006 22:44, Sven Neumann wrote:

Florent Monnier writes:

The Gegl web-site seems to have changed http://www.gegl.org Where is the doc now?

What doc are you refering to? What information are you missing?

He may not even _know_.

"Where is the doc now?" implies that something that was available before the change isn't anymore. In this case it is interesting to know what exactly is gone.

Michael

On 1/9/06, Michael Schumacher wrote:

"Where is the doc now?" implies that something that was available before the change isn't anymore. In this case it is interesting to know what exactly is gone.

API documentation. Btw, it would be great to have a nightly updated (using cron, of course) API documentation. We could link to it from the main page. If someone could do this part, I could do the docbook part (linking from main page in menu etc.).

Alexandre

Von: Alexandre Prokoudine

On 1/9/06, Michael Schumacher wrote:

"Where is the doc now?" implies that something that was available before the change isn't anymore. In this case it is interesting to know what exactly is gone.

API documentation. Btw, it would be great to have a nightly updated (using cron, of course) API documentation. We could link to it from the main page. If someone could do this part, I could do the docbook part (linking from main page in menu etc.).

IMO Sven has explained why this isn't a good idea yet.

HTH, Michael

On 1/10/06, Michael Schumacher wrote:

IMO Sven has explained why this isn't a good idea yet.

Well, I don't think he explained exactly *that* :) Anyway, you can count on me, when it comes to changes at gegl.org

Alexandre

Hi,

Alexandre Prokoudine writes:

On 1/10/06, Michael Schumacher wrote:

IMO Sven has explained why this isn't a good idea yet.

Well, I don't think he explained exactly *that* :)

Yes, I did. If you want to argue about it, feel free to do that. But it feels somewhat strange if you simply ignore my point.

Sven

On 1/11/06, Sven Neumann wrote:

On 1/10/06, Michael Schumacher wrote:

IMO Sven has explained why this isn't a good idea yet.

Well, I don't think he explained exactly *that* :)

Yes, I did. If you want to argue about it, feel free to do that. But it feels somewhat strange if you simply ignore my point.

Do I ignore? Oh well, thanks for letting me know :) I'll go reread the broken thread to find out why exactly it is a bad idea to publish API. May be I am missing something important that makes me look like a jerk :)

Alexandre

On 1/17/06, Florent Monnier wrote:

IMO Sven has explained why this isn't a good idea yet.

Well, I don't think he explained exactly *that* :)

Indeed he explained that the doc was removed because it was really too old and outdated, and that it was not sync to the content of the cvs, so people whilling to do some "do it yourself" with gegl should only refer to the doc generated from the cvs.

Indeed he explained that in gegl list which I don't read just like I don't read minds :)

Could we possibly finish with this and move over?

Alexandre

The Gegl web-site seems to have changed http://www.gegl.org Where is the doc now?

What doc are you refering to? What information are you missing?

He may not even _know_.

"Where is the doc now?" implies that something that was available before the change isn't anymore. In this case it is interesting to know what exactly is gone.

Yes, sven explained all was still in the cvs, but for new comers it's nice to see it on the web-site, so new comers could see if they are interested or not by the project.

IMO Sven has explained why this isn't a good idea yet.

Well, I don't think he explained exactly *that* :)

Indeed he explained that the doc was removed because it was really too old and outdated, and that it was not sync to the content of the cvs, so people whilling to do some "do it yourself" with gegl should only refer to the doc generated from the cvs.

Indeed he explained that in gegl list which I don't read just like I don't read minds :)

Could we possibly finish with this and move over?

Sorry!

But I came at the beginning on the gegl-dev ml with the question: "Hello,

Where is it to exchange about Gegl?"

And now I discover that gegl peoples talk about it on another place.

So please, please, do not agress me :) but rather peoples who put gegl threads out of the place it should.

Alexandre Prokoudine a écrit :

Indeed he explained that in gegl list which I don't read just like I don't read minds :)

Could we possibly finish with this and move over?

Sorry!

But I came at the beginning on the gegl-dev ml with the question: "Hello,

Where is it to exchange about Gegl?"

And now I discover that gegl peoples talk about it on another place.

So please, please, do not agress me :) but rather peoples who put gegl threads out of the place it should.