RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled
  1. Chat
  2. Useful links
  3. Polls

Featured content

gegl query

This discussion is connected to the gimp-developer-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

6 of 13 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.
40129A1F.1090208@centrum.cz 07 Oct 20:22
  gegl query Daniel Rogers 24 Jan 18:12
   gegl query Daniel Rogers 24 Jan 21:52
    gegl query Sven Neumann 25 Jan 13:37
     gegl query Jakub Friedl (listy) 25 Jan 13:53
      gegl query Sven Neumann 25 Jan 14:15
    gegl query David Neary 25 Jan 20:08
400BDACF.7070200@iaph.bas-n... 07 Oct 20:22
400BDC6E.4060605@free.fr 07 Oct 20:22
20040119134510.GM3669@tange... 07 Oct 20:22
400BE181.8040402@free.fr 07 Oct 20:22
401261B0.6040001@iaph.bas-n... 07 Oct 20:22
401296FB.2080400@phaseveloc... 07 Oct 20:22
Daniel Rogers
2004-01-24 18:12:58 UTC (about 21 years ago)

gegl query

Jakub Friedl (listy) wrote:

it would be nice. btw, how far is the gegl development? when we can expect gegl based release of gimp to be made? 2005?

I have been working on the pixel access stuff, some ICC colorspace classes using lcms, and some swap stuff. That should be done in a few weeks. The node stuff (of which there is aready a good chuck of it in CVS) will be done some months after that. It all depends on my (and calvins) free time of course (unless someone wants to pay me ;-)).

gegl introduction is slated to begin with the next developers version after 2.0, though we have not set any dates as to when that will lead to new features nor have we decided how this will proceed.

Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp. It would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004).

-- Daniel

Daniel Rogers
2004-01-24 21:52:51 UTC (about 21 years ago)

gegl query

Daniel Rogers wrote:

Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp. It would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004).

I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has made any specific plans. (From talking with other open source projects, 9-12 month release cycles keep interest high).

-- Daniel

Sven Neumann
2004-01-25 13:37:40 UTC (about 21 years ago)

gegl query

Hi,

Daniel Rogers writes:

Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp. It would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004).

I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has made any specific plans.

We did indeed make very specific plans for the time after the 2.0 release and decided that we are targetting a GIMP-2.2 release about six months after 2.0.0 hits the streets.

Sven

Jakub Friedl (listy)
2004-01-25 13:53:42 UTC (about 21 years ago)

gegl query

six months after 2.0.0 hits the streets.

Sven

so 2.2 will be gegl based?

Sven Neumann
2004-01-25 14:15:46 UTC (about 21 years ago)

gegl query

Hi,

"Jakub Friedl (listy)" writes:

so 2.2 will be gegl based?

That hasn't been decided yet. Perhaps we will start to use some GEGL functionality in 2.2 already but don't expect any user-visible changes due to this.

Sven

David Neary
2004-01-25 20:08:58 UTC (about 21 years ago)

gegl query

Hi,

Daniel Rogers wrote:

Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp. It would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004).

I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has made any specific plans. (From talking with other open source projects, 9-12 month release cycles keep interest high).

It's my opinion too. It's also the general plan that was discussed at the GIMP conference in Berlin. I'd personally like to aim for a 6 month stable release turnaround, similar to GNOME. At least for 2.2.

Of course, this is just my opinion

Cheers, Dave.