RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled
  1. Chat
  2. Useful links
  3. Polls

Featured content

(was: suggestion for new versions of GIMP) suggestion for a better explanation of the way to address various graphic problems with GIMP

This discussion is connected to the gimp-developer-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

Marco Ciampa
2011-11-29 13:55:25 UTC (almost 13 years ago)

(was: suggestion for new versions of GIMP) suggestion for a better explanation of the way to address various graphic problems with GIMP

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:13:35AM -0300, gespertino@gmail.com wrote:

The last one, I promess!

[...]

P.s.: It was worth it, indeed. ;-)

May I ask you (two) a favor?

Since the entire OT thread turned out to be soooooo intresting to me (do not know if anyone other agree here, IMHO many...) is there a chance to see this topic described well as a FAQ entry or (better) somewherelse, in a wiki, in the GIMP manual, elsewhere?

I mean:

- some description of the problem - some examples of solutions (more of one with more of one "problem" - for the web only
- for the press only
- for cross-media
- etc.
- explanation of terms / methods
- early, intermediate, late binding - gamut of the outputs
- color profiles and _real_ life use of them - etc.
- GIMP workflows examples
- GIMP tools to use with the workflows - conclusion and future perspective

IMHO a GIMP wiki would be best to address this...

in the hope of being sufficiently clear...

Thanks in advance!

gespertino@gmail.com
2011-11-29 14:47:26 UTC (almost 13 years ago)

(was: suggestion for new versions of GIMP) suggestion for a better explanation of the way to address various graphic problems with GIMP

2011/11/29 Marco Ciampa :

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:13:35AM -0300,

May I ask you (two) a favor?

Sure! If the rest agrees I could do it, of course. Bogdan, would you give me a hand?

What do you think about using this thread to resume the topic and discuss possible disagreements, then post it in the wiki? It would be the first time I do that, so I'll need some guidance.

Gez