RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled
  1. Chat
  2. Useful links
  3. Polls

Featured content

More Brush dynamics?

This discussion is connected to the gimp-developer-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

8 of 8 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.
More Brush dynamics? Richard Gitschlag 13 Sep 18:26
  More Brush dynamics? Alexandre Prokoudine 13 Sep 22:42
   More Brush dynamics? Richard Gitschlag 14 Sep 13:52
    More Brush dynamics? Alexia Death 14 Sep 16:32
     More Brush dynamics? Richard Gitschlag 15 Sep 03:05
      More Brush dynamics? Brian Vanderburg II 15 Sep 13:37
       More Brush dynamics? Richard Gitschlag 15 Sep 13:50
        More Brush dynamics? Brian Vanderburg II 15 Sep 13:54
Richard Gitschlag
2011-09-13 18:26:41 UTC (over 13 years ago)

More Brush dynamics?

I recently discovered I've misplaced my Wacom pen stylus -- the tablet equivalent of losing your car keys. Ouch.

Anyway, it gave me an idea for GIMP: Can the "Incremental" and "Fade Out" brush options be incorporated into the Brush Dynamics grid? The options basically link opacity to stroke length, but it would be nice if we could link stroke length with other factors like brush hardness or color. (For example, linking color to stroke length would mimic the effect of a simple gradient.)

-- Stratadrake strata_ranger@hotmail.com
--------------------
Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.

Alexandre Prokoudine
2011-09-13 22:42:14 UTC (over 13 years ago)

More Brush dynamics?

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:

I recently discovered I've misplaced my Wacom pen stylus -- the tablet equivalent of losing your car keys.

Richard Gitschlag
2011-09-14 13:52:40 UTC (over 13 years ago)

More Brush dynamics?

Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:42:14 +0400 From: alexandre.prokoudine@gmail.com To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] More Brush dynamics?

Dunno about "Increment", but "Fade" is already in the brush dynamics matrix for 2.8. The matrix is currently 7x10, and I strongly suggest the team to consider building and selling a customized version of monome to control it :)

Actually I'm probably mistaken on the "incremental" option -- been a long time since I tried to use it.

So what are all the dynamics on the plate for 2.8 anyway (compared to 2.6) ?

-- Stratadrake strata_ranger@hotmail.com
--------------------
Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.

Alexia Death
2011-09-14 16:32:47 UTC (over 13 years ago)

More Brush dynamics?

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:

Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:42:14 +0400 From: alexandre.prokoudine@gmail.com To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] More Brush dynamics?

Dunno about "Increment", but "Fade" is already in the brush dynamics matrix for 2.8. The matrix is currently 7x10, and I strongly suggest the team to consider building and selling a customized version of monome to control it :)

Actually I'm probably mistaken on the "incremental" option -- been a long time since I tried to use it.

So what are all the dynamics on the plate for 2.8 anyway (compared to 2.6) ?

Why not grab some 2.7.3 build and try it out? :) There is lots to discover:)

Richard Gitschlag
2011-09-15 03:05:31 UTC (over 13 years ago)

More Brush dynamics?

Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:32:47 +0300

Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] More Brush dynamics?

So what are all the dynamics on the plate for 2.8 anyway (compared to 2.6) ?

Why not grab some 2.7.3 build and try it out? :) There is lots to discover:) --
--Alexia

*shrugs* preference for stable versions maybe? The only "non-stable" FOSS I run is FontForge and that is by necessity, not choice.

-- Stratadrake strata_ranger@hotmail.com
--------------------
Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.

Brian Vanderburg II
2011-09-15 13:37:05 UTC (over 13 years ago)

More Brush dynamics?

I've played with 2.7.3 on Windows a little bit. Here are some other ideas for new dynamic outputs: Hue, Saturation, and Value/Luminance

Brian Allen Vanderburg II

Richard Gitschlag
2011-09-15 13:50:19 UTC (over 13 years ago)

More Brush dynamics?

Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:37:05 -0400 From: brianvanderburg2@aim.com
To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] More Brush dynamics?

I've played with 2.7.3 on Windows a little bit. Here are some other

ideas for new dynamic outputs: Hue, Saturation, and Value/Luminance

Brian Allen Vanderburg II

Those can already be simulated using the Color dynamic and careful RGB values, although as mentioned in bug #572300 the current "Color" dynamic (i.e. low pressure = FG, high pressure = BG) is a bit counter-intuitive in 2.6.

-- Stratadrake strata_ranger@hotmail.com
--------------------
Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.

Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Brian Vanderburg II
2011-09-15 13:54:48 UTC (over 13 years ago)

More Brush dynamics?

On 09/15/2011 09:50 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:

Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:37:05 -0400 From: brianvanderburg2@aim.com
To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] More Brush dynamics?

I've played with 2.7.3 on Windows a little bit. Here are some other

ideas for new dynamic outputs: Hue, Saturation, and Value/Luminance

Brian Allen Vanderburg II

Those can already be simulated using the Color dynamic and careful RGB values, although as mentioned in bug #572300 the current "Color" dynamic (i.e. low pressure = FG, high pressure = BG) is a bit counter-intuitive in 2.6.

If I want something more complicated, say I want to use the color output and fade input to paint a gradient stroke, but also want the pressure to adjust the saturation, so lighter pressure would make the stroke more gray and harder pressure would make the stroke more color. How would I do this with the current dynamic?

Brian Allen Vanderburg II