RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

Discussion - Bug 61499: GIMP deletes IPTC and other metadata

This discussion is connected to the gimp-developer-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

2 of 2 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

Discussion - Bug 61499: GIMP deletes IPTC and other metadata Jon E. Pearkins 26 May 02:23
  Discussion - Bug 61499: GIMP deletes IPTC and other metadata Martin Nordholts 26 May 17:07
Jon E. Pearkins
2010-05-26 02:23:27 UTC (over 14 years ago)

Discussion - Bug 61499: GIMP deletes IPTC and other metadata

Bug 61499 was initiated 8 1/2 years ago and has become a "catch all" for missing metadata issues. But, with its focus on viewing/changing metadata values -- a major GIMP enhancement for which stand-alone tools already exist -- it is easy to forget a much larger issue to GIMP users, that most would consider a "serious bug": (some) existing IPTC and other metadata is lost whenever you Open-Save a .jpg.

In my own case, I've been working, off and on, for a year to create a "Caption It Once, Use it Forever" approach for WordPress photo galleries that used the IPTC field "Caption_Abstract" of a .jpg file. Set the field right when the original picture is loaded on to a computer. And you have a caption for life, including automatically generated in WordPress photo galleries during upload. Obviously, this is not viable if a simple cropping or resizing in GIMP loses the metadata where the caption is stored. I have documented the problem in Bug 619554.

What is the best way to ask the GIMP Development team to consider dividing Bug 61499 into two separate tracks: serious bug (loss of metadata) and enhancement (view/edit metadata)?

Martin Nordholts
2010-05-26 17:07:48 UTC (over 14 years ago)

Discussion - Bug 61499: GIMP deletes IPTC and other metadata

On 05/26/2010 02:23 AM, Jon E. Pearkins wrote:

What is the best way to ask the GIMP Development team to consider dividing Bug 61499 into two separate tracks: serious bug (loss of metadata) and enhancement (view/edit metadata)?

Hi,

I agree loss of metadata is a serious issue, but I don't think there is a point in open up a separate "catch all" bug report for that unless there are patches to be attached.

BR, Martin