RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions

This discussion is connected to the gimp-developer-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

7 of 8 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

20916064.219094.12693818279... Merkelvin Glasmer 23 Mar 23:03
  The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions Martin Nordholts 23 Mar 23:46
  The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions Alexandre Prokoudine 23 Mar 23:57
  The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions Sven Neumann 24 Mar 20:02
   The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions Karl Günter Wünsch 24 Mar 20:11
    The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions Alexandre Prokoudine 24 Mar 20:17
    The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions Sven Neumann 24 Mar 20:22
     The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions Karl Günter Wünsch 24 Mar 20:44
Martin Nordholts
2010-03-23 23:46:50 UTC (over 14 years ago)

The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions

On 03/23/2010 11:03 PM, Merkelvin Glasmer wrote:

Hello,

I just have two questions about the future of the implementation of GEGL into The GIMP:

1. I read on different websites, that in future it will be possible to open RAW image formats of different camera manufacturers natively in GIMP without the requirement of additional software. Is this true?

It makes sense for our product vision and there is nothing technically difficult about it, assuming there is a library around that does the grunt work, so yes eventually GIMP will be able to do this. The usual disclaimer still applies: If you want to make sure this happens, help us with it. Right now there are no work planned explicitly for this.

2. Is GIMP going to support (also save to) the PFM file format http://gl.ict.usc.edu/HDRShop/PFM/PFM_Image_File_Format.html and will it be possible to make HDR information?

If someone writes a plug-in for it, then yes. Nothing the current members of the core team plans to do though AFAIK.

/ Martin

Alexandre Prokoudine
2010-03-23 23:57:04 UTC (over 14 years ago)

The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions

On 3/24/10, Merkelvin Glasmer wrote:

I just have two questions about the future of the implementation of GEGL into The GIMP:

1. I read on different websites, that in future it will be possible to open RAW image formats of different camera manufacturers natively in GIMP without the requirement of additional software. Is this true?

In fact GEGL is already tied to libopenraw which is a Raw can-opener written from scratch. Unfortunately, libopenraw seems to be discontinued by its developer, so the future perhaps lies in libraw which is dcraw turned into a modern library with multithreading support and all that jazz. As soon as GIMP starts using GEGL loaders, someone could write a loader via libraw.

2. Is GIMP going to support (also save to) the PFM file format http://gl.ict.usc.edu/HDRShop/PFM/PFM_Image_File_Format.html and will it be possible to make HDR information?

There is nothing special about PFM what would make it difficult to support this file format in GEGL and, later, in GIMP. Judging by some projects, creating a PFM saver is a few days work, if not less. One just needs to sit down and actually write code. That's all.

Alexandre

Sven Neumann
2010-03-24 20:02:37 UTC (over 14 years ago)

The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions

On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 23:03 +0100, Merkelvin Glasmer wrote:

I just have two questions about the future of the implementation of GEGL into The GIMP:

1. I read on different websites, that in future it will be possible to open RAW image formats of different camera manufacturers natively in GIMP without the requirement of additional software. Is this true?

If you don't consider a plug-in additional software, then you can already do that today. The difference with a GEGL-enabled GIMP is that you can then work in the higher color-depths that the RAW format offers. Today the RAW image is converted to 8bit per color channel on import into GIMP.

Sven

Karl Günter Wünsch
2010-03-24 20:11:19 UTC (over 14 years ago)

The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions

On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Sven Neumann wrote:

If you don't consider a plug-in additional software, then you can already do that today.

Sorry but I would consider this solution quite inadequate as higher color depths account for much of the leeway expected from using RAW image formats in digital cameras...

The difference with a GEGL-enabled GIMP is that you can then work in the higher color-depths that the RAW format offers.

Which only means that a GEGL enabled GIMP with appropriate input filters is the only way forward in this respect. regards
Karl Günter Wünsch

Alexandre Prokoudine
2010-03-24 20:17:51 UTC (over 14 years ago)

The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions

On 3/24/10, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:

The difference with a GEGL-enabled GIMP is that you can then work in the higher color-depths that the RAW format offers.

Which only means that a GEGL enabled GIMP with appropriate input filters is the only way forward in this respect.

Fortunately ACR, smart objects et al. are not the only acceptable way of dealing with Raw files :)

Alexandre

Sven Neumann
2010-03-24 20:22:46 UTC (over 14 years ago)

The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions

On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 20:11 +0100, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:

On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Sven Neumann wrote:

If you don't consider a plug-in additional software, then you can already do that today.

Sorry but I would consider this solution quite inadequate as higher color depths account for much of the leeway expected from using RAW image formats in digital cameras...

Well, if you ever looked at the UFRaw Import Plug-in, you'd know that it gives you a lot of control over how the conversion to 8 bit is done. So you already get most of the benefits of the RAW format. It's just somewhat uncomfortable that you have to do all the color and exposure correction at the import step.

The difference with a GEGL-enabled GIMP is that you can then work in the higher color-depths that the RAW format offers.

Which only means that a GEGL enabled GIMP with appropriate input filters is the only way forward in this respect.

Sure.

Sven

Karl Günter Wünsch
2010-03-24 20:44:12 UTC (over 14 years ago)

The future of GEGL and Gimp: Questions

On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Sven Neumann wrote:

Well, if you ever looked at the UFRaw Import Plug-in, you'd know that it gives you a lot of control over how the conversion to 8 bit is done. So you already get most of the benefits of the RAW format. It's just somewhat uncomfortable that you have to do all the color and exposure correction at the import step.

The problem is that I recently read about the scaling problems in any non- linear colour space and as a result have tried scaling some of my images in a 16 bit linear colour space - with stunning results. So UFRaw helps with the first problem of doing the conversion but 8 bit GIMP is messing up things later in the editing process... For the moment I am living with the results but now knowing how much better they can look without having to compensate late in the editing process having a workflow which would start with the 14 bit depth my camera provides per colour channel and never drops to a non linear colour space before the final save to JPEG would be preferred and I hope that a GEGL enabled GIMP will do so in the forseable future... regards
Karl Günter Wünsch