Flame plug-in and large images.
El lun, 21-09-2009 a las 14:44 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
Please excuse me if this was sent twice, as I may have sent it from the
wrong E-mail address.
I noticed in the docs that it explicitly states that the flame plug-in
wasn't working with large images, stating that while it worked with an image
at the resolution of 1024x768, it failed with one at 2500x2500.
I tried this out on multiple platforms. On GNU/Linux (Ubuntu 8.10, x86 W/
512MB of RAM, Gimp 2.6.1) the flame plug-in was successful on a 2560x1600
image. That was the largest I tried on that platform. On Windows (Windows 7
build 7600, x86 w/2GB of RAM, Gimp 2.6.6), it was successful on a 3840x2400
image, which is quite a bit larger than the 2500x2500 stated.
Should the documentation be changed, as it would seem that the plug-in does
work with large images?
~Nick
It still fails on my system with 2Gb Ram, gimp-2.6.6 under Gentoo. I think that
it depends on flame used. I attach one for reproducing, simply open it with flame
plugin and try to apply it to a black image of 2500x2500 (well, it fails for me
one it's larger than 2000)
But I am not sure if I should open a bug report for this :-/
Regards
Really attaching it. Test it with zoom=4
time 0,2
image_size 2028 1536 center 0,1 0 pixels_per_unit 100
spatial_oversample 2 spatial_filter_radius 0,75 sample_density 5
nbatches 1 white_level 200
brightness 1 gamma 2 cmap_inter 0
xform 0 density 1 color 1
var 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
coefs -0,838504 0,480056 0,14986 -0,716226 0,576762 0,219756
xform 1 density 1 color 0
var 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
coefs -0,636694 -0,457333 0,017635 0,728182 0,074694 -0,489891
xform 2 density 1 color 0
var 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
coefs 0,443109 -0,490792 -0,684466 -0,305791 -0,344419 -0,147514
xform 3 density 1 color 0
var 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
coefs -0,706116 -0,227088 0,342798 0,8249 -0,689059 -0,362536
;
