How long to become active? (unable to use git)
This discussion is connected to the gimp-docs-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.
This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.
How long to become active? (unable to use git) | Andrew Douglas Pitonyak | 21 Jun 22:31 |
How long to become active? (unable to use git) | Sven Neumann | 22 Jun 00:33 |
How long to become active? (unable to use git) | Andrew Douglas Pitonyak | 22 Jun 01:52 |
How long to become active? (unable to use git) | Roman Joost | 22 Jun 08:57 |
How long to become active? (unable to use git) | Andrew Douglas Pitonyak | 22 Jun 23:32 |
How long to become active? (unable to use git)
I am a new member. I used the name Andrew Pitonyak. I failed to use git to obtain the latest copy of the documentation
$ git clone ssh://AndrewPitonyak@git.gnome.org/git/gimp-help-2
Initialized empty Git repository in
/andrew0/home/andy/Devsrc/Gimp/DocDev/gimp-help-2/.git/
Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
I used ssh -v to check for possible reasons:
$ ssh -v AndrewPitonyak@git.gnome.org
OpenSSH_5.1p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007
debug1: Reading configuration data /andrew0/home/andy/.ssh/config
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: Applying options for *
debug1: Connecting to git.gnome.org [209.132.176.202] port 22.
debug1: Connection established.
debug1: identity file /andrew0/home/andy/.ssh/identity type -1
debug1: identity file /andrew0/home/andy/.ssh/id_rsa type 1
debug1: identity file /andrew0/home/andy/.ssh/id_dsa type 2
debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_4.3
debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.3 pat OpenSSH_4*
debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.1
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
debug1: kex: server->client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none
debug1: kex: client->server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(1024 is known and matches the RSA host key.
debug1: Found key in /andrew0/home/andy/.ssh/known_hosts:3
debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received
debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey
debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
debug1: Offering public key: /andrew0/home/andy/.ssh/id_dsa
debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey
debug1: Offering public key: /andrew0/home/andy/.ssh/id_rsa
debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey
debug1: Trying private key: /andrew0/home/andy/.ssh/identity
debug1: No more authentication methods to try.
Permission denied (publickey).
Must I do something specific so that my newly created username AndrewPitonyak (user name for live.gnome.org) will work with my newly created id_dsa or id_rsa. Note that I did set the permissions to 600 for the files and 700 for ~/.ssh itself.
I have not done anything with github, if that is required.
How long to become active? (unable to use git)
Hi,
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 16:31 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
$ git clone ssh://AndrewPitonyak@git.gnome.org/git/gimp-help-2 Initialized empty Git repository in /andrew0/home/andy/Devsrc/Gimp/DocDev/gimp-help-2/.git/ Permission denied (publickey).
Do you have an account for git.gnome.org account at all?
Note that you can create a clone without having an account. Just clone from git://git.gnome.org/gimp-help-2 You only need to use the ssh URL if you intend to push your changes to the master repository.
Must I do something specific so that my newly created username AndrewPitonyak (user name for live.gnome.org) will work with my newly created id_dsa or id_rsa. Note that I did set the permissions to 600 for the files and 700 for ~/.ssh itself.
Your account for the GNOME Wiki has nothing to do with having commit access to the GNOME git repository. The latter is reserved for people who have already submitted a reasonable number of patches and needs approval from module maintainers.
Sven
How long to become active? (unable to use git)
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 16:31 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
$ git clone ssh://AndrewPitonyak@git.gnome.org/git/gimp-help-2 Initialized empty Git repository in /andrew0/home/andy/Devsrc/Gimp/DocDev/gimp-help-2/.git/ Permission denied (publickey).
Do you have an account for git.gnome.org account at all?
I created an account with "live.gnome.org". I suppose that I was under the mistaken impression that they were related.
Note that you can create a clone without having an account. Just clone from git://git.gnome.org/gimp-help-2 You only need to use the ssh URL if you intend to push your changes to the master repository.
The only reason that I cared was because I spent a few hours reading through GIMP documentation. I submitted changes directly to Roman Joost. Roman indicated that he would integrate my changes but that he was busy so that it would likely take weeks. I told him that I would attempt to integrate the changes myself. I also indicated that unless someone was familiar with my work that I expected that my proposed changes would be vetted. With the process in place here, it is not clear to me how that is done, but with GIT I believe that it is possible (and that it would be very difficult with SVN). Note that apart from my initial exchange with Roman, I have not had further communications, so I am NOT saying that Roman indicated that this would be possible. I was merely attempting to take the work off of him to integrate the changes that I had submitted.
All of my past experience has either been directly with publishers and editors (for published materials) and with the OpenOffice.org project, which uses an entirely different process.
Must I do something specific so that my newly created username AndrewPitonyak (user name for live.gnome.org) will work with my newly created id_dsa or id_rsa. Note that I did set the permissions to 600 for the files and 700 for ~/.ssh itself.
Your account for the GNOME Wiki has nothing to do with having commit access to the GNOME git repository. The latter is reserved for people who have already submitted a reasonable number of patches and needs approval from module maintainers
I see. OK, I think that I understand that what I was attempting to do is not possible. I will send a message to Roman and mention that he should take care of integrating the changes that I submitted.
My initial submission was as follows:
(1) A PDF document illustrating the initial documentation (complete with links to the original)
(2) A description of why I disliked the original
(3) What I thought that it should say.
(4) Comments on why I prefer the new text (including links into the documentation if I am commenting on consistency with other sections of the documentation.
Needless to say, this form of submission is very time consuming to produce and time consuming to integrate. In the time that I created this document for a few pages, I could have done many more. Unfortunately, the current documentation does not appear to lend itself to a "lets track changes and insert comments" mode of collaborative editing that I have used on the other projects in which I have participated. In this mode, the document "approver" is able to very quickly what changes have been made along with comments. It is then easy to accept and/or reject very low level changes in the documentation. On the other hand, I am also well aware of the inherent difficulties with the product to then generate multiple output types as is easily done with the form used by GIMP.
I assume, then, that I have no need for access if this is the expected form of submission from me for now.
How long to become active? (unable to use git)
Hi Andrew,
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 07:52:20PM -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I created an account with "live.gnome.org". I suppose that I was under the mistaken impression that they were related.
Note that you can create a clone without having an account. Just clone from git://git.gnome.org/gimp-help-2 You only need to use the ssh URL if you intend to push your changes to the master repository.
The only reason that I cared was because I spent a few hours reading through GIMP documentation. I submitted changes directly to Roman Joost. Roman indicated that he would integrate my changes but that he was busy so that it would likely take weeks. I told him that I would attempt to integrate the changes myself. I also indicated that unless someone was familiar with my work that I expected that my proposed changes would be vetted. With the process in place here, it is not clear to me how that is done, but with GIT I believe that it is possible (and that it would be very difficult with SVN). Note that apart from my initial exchange with Roman, I have not had further communications, so I am NOT saying that Roman indicated that this would be possible. I was merely attempting to take the work off of him to integrate the changes that I had submitted.
You could follow the following pages and try to setup yourself a sandbox to play with. As Sven already indicated, you create yourself a clone of manual on which everyone is working on:
git clone git://git.gnome.org/gimp-help-2
The relevant and helpful sites you want to look at:
http://docs.gimp.org/help.html http://live.gnome.org/Git
All of my past experience has either been directly with publishers and editors (for published materials) and with the OpenOffice.org project, which uses an entirely different process.
This is more developer centric.
Must I do something specific so that my newly created username AndrewPitonyak (user name for live.gnome.org) will work with my newly created id_dsa or id_rsa. Note that I did set the permissions to 600 for the files and 700 for ~/.ssh itself.
Your account for the GNOME Wiki has nothing to do with having commit access to the GNOME git repository. The latter is reserved for people who have already submitted a reasonable number of patches and needs approval from module maintainers
I see. OK, I think that I understand that what I was attempting to do is not possible. I will send a message to Roman and mention that he should take care of integrating the changes that I submitted.
As an 'anonymous' contributor you can work on your created copy with git. You can make commits to your local repository and you can send in your changes to one of the authors or me (git format-patch creates a set of patches which can be easily applied and verified).
Needless to say, this form of submission is very time consuming to produce and time consuming to integrate. In the time that I created this document for a few pages, I could have done many more. Unfortunately, the current documentation does not appear to lend itself to a "lets track changes and insert comments" mode of collaborative editing that I have used on the other projects in which I have participated.
That is provided by git, which as I've mentioned above is more developer centric. You probably need a bit of time to understand and use it.
Good luck :)
How long to become active? (unable to use git)
I will try to setup a local copy.... It appears to be working, but download speed is affected by a serious live Fedora-11 upgrade that is in-progress. I figured that I would try it to see if it is as painless as they proclaim.... Life will be interesting.
Roman Joost wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 07:52:20PM -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I created an account with "live.gnome.org". I suppose that I was under the mistaken impression that they were related.
Note that you can create a clone without having an account. Just clone from git://git.gnome.org/gimp-help-2 You only need to use the ssh URL if you intend to push your changes to the master repository.
The only reason that I cared was because I spent a few hours reading through GIMP documentation. I submitted changes directly to Roman Joost. Roman indicated that he would integrate my changes but that he was busy so that it would likely take weeks. I told him that I would attempt to integrate the changes myself. I also indicated that unless someone was familiar with my work that I expected that my proposed changes would be vetted. With the process in place here, it is not clear to me how that is done, but with GIT I believe that it is possible (and that it would be very difficult with SVN). Note that apart from my initial exchange with Roman, I have not had further communications, so I am NOT saying that Roman indicated that this would be possible. I was merely attempting to take the work off of him to integrate the changes that I had submitted.
You could follow the following pages and try to setup yourself a sandbox to play with. As Sven already indicated, you create yourself a clone of manual on which everyone is working on:
git clone git://git.gnome.org/gimp-help-2
The relevant and helpful sites you want to look at:
http://docs.gimp.org/help.html http://live.gnome.org/Git
All of my past experience has either been directly with publishers and editors (for published materials) and with the OpenOffice.org project, which uses an entirely different process.
This is more developer centric.
Must I do something specific so that my newly created username AndrewPitonyak (user name for live.gnome.org) will work with my newly created id_dsa or id_rsa. Note that I did set the permissions to 600 for the files and 700 for ~/.ssh itself.
Your account for the GNOME Wiki has nothing to do with having commit access to the GNOME git repository. The latter is reserved for people who have already submitted a reasonable number of patches and needs approval from module maintainers
I see. OK, I think that I understand that what I was attempting to do is not possible. I will send a message to Roman and mention that he should take care of integrating the changes that I submitted.
As an 'anonymous' contributor you can work on your created copy with git. You can make commits to your local repository and you can send in your changes to one of the authors or me (git format-patch creates a set of patches which can be easily applied and verified).
Needless to say, this form of submission is very time consuming to produce and time consuming to integrate. In the time that I created this document for a few pages, I could have done many more. Unfortunately, the current documentation does not appear to lend itself to a "lets track changes and insert comments" mode of collaborative editing that I have used on the other projects in which I have participated.
That is provided by git, which as I've mentioned above is more developer centric. You probably need a bit of time to understand and use it.
Good luck :)