RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled

migration source file checking script needed

This discussion is connected to the gimp-docs-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

2 of 3 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.

mailman.5.1219777206.10993.... 07 Oct 20:29
  Gimp-docs Digest, Vol 51, Issue 8 Vitaly Lomov 27 Aug 10:27
   migration source file checking script needed Marco Ciampa 27 Aug 18:54
Vitaly Lomov
2008-08-27 10:27:59 UTC (over 16 years ago)

Gimp-docs Digest, Vol 51, Issue 8

So IMHO we had to add one more step:

0. Check and edit every single source file...

We have to do this manually unfortunately. There is no better way around this IMHO. A program would also only be able to just guess. Let's face the advantages: we do have some time for clean up ;)

How do we want to proceed? Do the authors (please yell know ;) want to do a migration for themself, using a small script or should someone of us (Ulf or me probably) should do the migration?

If no one of the authors votes for step 1, than I propose a migration using step 2 the next weekend.

I would go for a script that outputs all areas that it gets confused in, i.e. no direct en->LANG correspondance. I don't mind manually correcting a file till the output from such script is empty.

Marco Ciampa
2008-08-27 18:54:16 UTC (over 16 years ago)

migration source file checking script needed

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:27:59AM +0100, Vitaly Lomov wrote:

So IMHO we had to add one more step:

0. Check and edit every single source file...

We have to do this manually unfortunately. There is no better way around this IMHO. A program would also only be able to just guess. Let's face the advantages: we do have some time for clean up ;)

How do we want to proceed? Do the authors (please yell know ;) want to do a migration for themself, using a small script or should someone of us (Ulf or me probably) should do the migration?

If no one of the authors votes for step 1, than I propose a migration using step 2 the next weekend.

I would go for a script that outputs all areas that it gets confused in, i.e. no direct en->LANG correspondance. I don't mind manually correcting a file till the output from such script is empty.

Yes, that was what I mean with my last email, sorry for my poor english...