RSS/Atom feed Twitter
Site is read-only, email is disabled
  1. Chat
  2. Useful links
  3. Polls

Featured content

Roadmap

This discussion is connected to the gimp-docs-list.gnome.org mailing list which is provided by the GIMP developers and not related to gimpusers.com.

This is a read-only list on gimpusers.com so this discussion thread is read-only, too.

7 of 7 messages available
Toggle history

Please log in to manage your subscriptions.
Roadmap Roman Joost 13 Nov 13:05
  Roadmap julien 13 Nov 22:39
   Roadmap Roman Joost 13 Nov 23:47
  Roadmap Marco Ciampa 14 Nov 02:13
   Roadmap Roman Joost 14 Nov 02:35
    Roadmap Marco Ciampa 14 Nov 02:54
     Roadmap Choi, Ji-Hui 14 Nov 03:05
Roman Joost
2006-11-13 13:05:56 UTC (about 18 years ago)

Roadmap

Hey folks,

I've been working on a little roadmap towards Gimp2.4. I put it on our WIKI. Please let me know what is missing, what is too unlikely to happen or just not important as I thought.

Check out the wiki at:

http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/GimpDocsRoadmap

Thanks!

julien
2006-11-13 22:39:29 UTC (about 18 years ago)

Roadmap

Hi Roman,

What do you mean with "reference part"?

Roman Joost
2006-11-13 23:47:26 UTC (about 18 years ago)

Roadmap

On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 07:39:23AM +0100, julien wrote:

Hi Roman,

What do you mean with "reference part"?

The part 3, counting from chapter 8 on: "Toolbox".

http://docs.gimp.org/en/pt03.html

Greetings,

Marco Ciampa
2006-11-14 02:13:57 UTC (about 18 years ago)

Roadmap

On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:05:06PM +0100, Roman Joost wrote:

Hey folks,

I've been working on a little roadmap towards Gimp2.4. I put it on our WIKI. Please let me know what is missing, what is too unlikely to happen or just not important as I thought.

Check out the wiki at:

http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/GimpDocsRoadmap

I totally agree. This is a great step. In particular this is a really good thing:

New Release cycle

I propose, that releases were made on fixed dates: every two months.

It could be even a bit more "relaxed" cycle (of three or four months or so) but there is the need to fix the date to "freeze" or to check for errors in a more sistematic way.

How about doing like ubuntu? i. e. gimp-help version 0.x.[00|04|08]

bye

Roman Joost
2006-11-14 02:35:13 UTC (about 18 years ago)

Roadmap

Hi Marco,

On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:13:52AM +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:

On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:05:06PM +0100, Roman Joost wrote:

New Release cycle

I propose, that releases were made on fixed dates: every two months.

It could be even a bit more "relaxed" cycle (of three or four months or so) but there is the need to fix the date to "freeze" or to check for errors in a more sistematic way.

Actually I first thought about every month, because of bunch of changes the manual last months had. The last release was in April, which is far too old. But that is my fault.

So, lets say a release every three months on a fixed date (like first day in the month) would be okey?

How about doing like ubuntu? i. e. gimp-help version 0.x.[00|04|08]

Hm.. I'd like to stick on our versioning scheme.

Thanks for your comments,

Marco Ciampa
2006-11-14 02:54:26 UTC (about 18 years ago)

Roadmap

On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:34:21AM +0100, Roman Joost wrote:

Hi Marco,

On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:13:52AM +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:

On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:05:06PM +0100, Roman Joost wrote:

New Release cycle

I propose, that releases were made on fixed dates: every two months.

It could be even a bit more "relaxed" cycle (of three or four months or so) but there is the need to fix the date to "freeze" or to check for errors in a more sistematic way.

Actually I first thought about every month, because of bunch of changes the manual last months had. The last release was in April, which is far too old. But that is my fault.

So, lets say a release every three months on a fixed date (like first day in the month) would be okey?

ok so: 01/01 - 01/04 - 01/07 - 01/10 ?

How about doing like ubuntu? i. e. gimp-help version 0.x.[00|04|08]

Hm.. I'd like to stick on our versioning scheme.

no problem, it's just a label.

Choi, Ji-Hui
2006-11-14 03:05:17 UTC (about 18 years ago)

Roadmap

On 11/14/06, Marco Ciampa wrote:

ok so: 01/01 - 01/04 - 01/07 - 01/10 ?

They mean janaury 1st, april 1st, July 1st, October 1st, don't? you know, we-Korean- don't use like as date-month-year. instead of, year-month-date like as 2006, 11,14

please consider other cultures. ^^; well.. it;s a very small thing..

and by the way, I agree the term of three month. two month seems to be too short.