<revision>
Hi Julien,
Am 11.03.2006 um 15:13 schrieb julien:
Are you sure?
"1/" was the example given by Roman and used in toolbox/intro.xml
or tool-rect-select.xml for instance: working well.
not everything the build process does not complain about is valid
docbook. Have a look at http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/
revision.html to learn more about the element.
Another way to ask my question: must we have only one revnumber for
the file (and for all languages) or a revnumber for every language
in the file?
we do have more than on element for the revision number but get only
one revision from cvs. Therefore the revision number is the same for
all languages in one file/section.
Greetings,
lexA
btw. On which level do we do the revision tags anyway? One per sect1
and sect2 and sect3 or only the topmost of each file or ... ?
Julien
Axel Wernicke a ?crit :
Hi,
Am 11.03.2006 um 08:33 schrieb julien:
I don't well understand
Should it be:
1/
$revision:$
...
...
...
...
with only one revnumber for the file,
or
2/
$revision:$
...
...
$revision:$
...
...
with a revnumber for every language in the file?
The first version is simply not valid docbook xml. Thats why it
can't be used.
lexa
julien